ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Retropharyngeal hematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) is commonly performed for degenerative, traumatic, infectious, and neoplastic conditions of the cervical spine and is generally associated with favorable outcomes and low complication rates. However, postoperative retropharyngeal hematoma is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication due to the risk of rapid airway compromise. This narrative review summarizes the anatomy, pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of retropharyngeal hematoma following ACSS. Methods: A narrative review was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and manual reference review. Search terms included "anterior cervical spine surgery", "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion", "retropharyngeal hematoma", "postoperative cervical hematoma", and "airway compromise". English-language human studies, including retrospective cohorts, case series, case reports, and relevant reviews, were included. Given the heterogeneity of available data, no formal quality scoring or meta-analysis was performed. Key Content and Findings: Retropharyngeal hematoma most commonly occurs within the first 24 hours after surgery, but delayed presentations after discharge have been reported. Presenting symptoms may include progressive dysphagia, hoarseness, neck swelling, stridor, dyspnea, and respiratory distress. Airway compromise primarily results from mechanical compression of the pharynx and larynx by an expanding hematoma, often with secondary soft tissue edema. Reported risk factors include multilevel surgery, coagulopathy or anticoagulation, poor perioperative blood pressure control, male sex, advanced age, medical comorbidity, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and difficult airway morphology. Potential bleeding sources include vascular or soft-tissue oozing, as well as exposed cancellous bony endplates when open interbody cages are inadequately packed. Early recognition, airway control, emergent wound decompression when indicated, and surgical evacuation are central to management. Conclusions: Although uncommon, retropharyngeal hematoma following ACSS requires a high index of suspicion because deterioration can be rapid. Awareness of risk factors, meticulous hemostasis including bony endplate hemostasis, early postoperative monitoring, and prompt multidisciplinary airway management are essential. Prospective studies are needed to better define monitoring strategies and risk stratification models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.