ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026
Long-read based detection of large copy number variants with potential functional significance using the ContextSV structural variant caller.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read sequencing enables improved detection of structural variants (SVs) in the human genome due to its substantially increased read lengths. However, currently widely used long-read SV callers primarily rely on alignment-based evidence, limiting their ability to detect large and complex SVs and potentially missing disease-relevant events. To address these limitations, we developed ContextSV, a framework that integrates alignment evidence with copy number predictions derived from sequencing coverage and single-nucleotide variant allele frequencies to improve SV detection, particularly for large copy number variants (CNVs). We additionally developed ContextScore, a machine learning-based classification model to assign SV confidence scores based on genomic context features and integrated it within ContextSV. Through benchmarking analyses on both simulated and real datasets, we demonstrate that ContextSV improves detection of large CNVs and inversions that may be missed by existing long-read SV callers. We further illustrate its utility by identifying and experimentally validating multiple large SVs in the KOLF2.1J reference stem cell line that were not detected by other methods. Collectively, our results demonstrate that ContextSV serves as a valuable complement to existing long-read SV detection approaches by improving sensitivity for large and clinically relevant SVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.