ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Integrating domain-specific convolutional features with Swin Transformers for transparent cervical cancer diagnostics.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical cancer screening relies heavily on manual cytopathological evaluation, which is subjective and prone to inter-observer variability. While deep learning offers automated alternatives, existing models often struggle to capture both global cellular context and fine-grained biological nuances. To address this, we propose CAMF-Swin, a novel hybrid architecture for precise cervical cell classification. Methods: The CAMF-Swin framework integrates a hierarchical Swin Transformer backbone with four domain-specific convolutional modules to explicitly extract morphological, textural, nuclear, and cytoplasmic features. A Cross-Modal Attention Fusion (CMAF) mechanism is utilized to dynamically synthesize these diverse representations. The model was trained using stratified five-fold cross-validation and an ensemble strategy. Performance was validated on the multi-class SipakMed dataset and evaluated for generalizability on an independent, highly imbalanced Mendeley Liquid-Based Cytology (LBC) dataset. Additionally, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were integrated for Results: The CAMF-Swin ensemble achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78% and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.9722 on the SipakMed dataset. On the highly imbalanced Mendeley LBC dataset, the model maintained robust generalization, achieving 98.96% accuracy and an F1-Score of 0.9894. Furthermore, LIME visualizations confirmed the model's reliance on clinically relevant biomarkers, successfully identifying features such as perinuclear halos in koilocytotic cells. Discussion: These results demonstrate significant performance superiority over standard Vision Transformer variants and traditional convolutional networks, highlighting the architecture's resilience to real-world data imbalance. By providing transparent visual evidence of its decision boundaries, the model successfully bridges the gap between neural network predictions and expert pathological reasoning. Ultimately, the proposed framework establishes a robust foundational step toward automated clinical support, though rigorous prospective, multi-center validations remain necessary to facilitate safe real-world deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.