ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Feasibility of implementing collaborative decision skills training among veterans with psychosis: a qualitative study guided by the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Collaborative Decision Skills Training (CDST) is a promising group intervention for adults with serious mental illness (SMI) intended to increase collaborative decision-making (CDM) at the patient-clinician level. CDST previously underwent a systematic, community-engaged mixed methods adaptation to increase fit and feasibility for Veterans with psychosis at VA Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Recovery Centers (PRRCs). This qualitative study applies the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) framework to identify the fit and feasibility of the adapted version of CDST within VA PRRCs for Veterans with psychosis. Methods: Nine Veterans with psychosis and two clinicians who participated in a CDST pilot trial at a VA PRRC provided feedback about CDST in qualitative interviews. PRISM-mapped guides were used to administer semi-structured interviews and develop qualitative codes. Following the initial coding of interviews, four analysts applied a systematic thematic approach to identify themes within each PRISM domain, inclusive of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluation framework housed within PRISM. Identified themes were then reviewed by three analysts who reached consensus on the final themes to be presented in this paper. Results: Five cross-cutting themes were identified across PRISM domains, capturing CDST's conceptual alignment with PRRCs and the recovery model; variability of Veteran and clinician interest despite fit or effectiveness; the need for structural integration for sustainability; mixed perceptions of CDST's virtual format; and challenges with at-home practice completion. Additional themes were identified under PRISM Intervention Characteristics, Implementation and Sustainability Infrastructure, Recipients, and all RE-AIM outcomes which inform Veterans' and clinicians' implementation viability and sustainability. Conclusions: Application of the PRISM framework facilitated identification of multilevel determinants for CDST feasibility. CDST shows promising alignment with the recovery model and the structural approach to care at PRRCs, but delivery mode and auxiliary practice group require adjustment to support CDST's sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.