SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Clinical outcomes of early vs. late extubation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated clinical outcomes associated with earlier vs. later extubation in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and EBSCO from inception until April 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies. We included observational and interventional studies comparing early vs. late extubation following cardiac surgery in adult patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay, reintubation, postoperative pneumonia, and postoperative renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Secondary outcomes included mediastinal bleeding requiring re-exploration, tracheostomy, and hospital or ICU readmission. Risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for observational studies. Data synthesis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4. For continuous outcomes, pooled effect estimates were expressed as mean differences (MDs). For dichotomous outcomes, pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated. Random-effects models were used as the primary analysis. A subgroup analysis based on extubation threshold ( ≤ 6 h or >6 h) was conducted. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi-square test and the Results: A total of 237 records were identified, of which only 19 studies (18 observational and one randomized trial) were included in this meta-analysis. Earlier extubation was associated with lower odds of mortality (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.23), reintubation (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.70), postoperative pneumonia (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.45), renal failure requiring CRRT (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.06-0.17), postoperative tracheostomy (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.03), and hospital or ICU readmission (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.86). Conclusions: In adults undergoing cardiac surgery, earlier extubation was associated with favorable postoperative outcomes including lower mortality, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and lower rates of reintubation, postoperative pneumonia, tracheostomy, CRRT, and hospital or ICU readmission. However, future randomized trials and prospective studies are warranted as the available evidence was predominantly observational and clinically heterogeneous. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261361735, identifier: CRD420261361735.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.