Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719079›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

Independent Risk Factors for Placental Abruption in Preeclampsia and a Preliminary Prediction Model: A Retrospective Study with Internal Validation.

Ying Wang, Xuanying Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying WangObstetric Nursing, Tangshan Central Hospital, Tangshan, 063000, People's Republic of China.
Xuanying ZhouObstetric Nursing, Tangshan Central Hospital, Tangshan, 063000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-1178-3798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify independent risk factors for placental abruption (PA) in preeclamptic (PE) women and to develop a preliminary predictive tool based on routinely available clinical indicators. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 51 PE women with PA and 357 PE women without PA (control group) admitted between August 2020 and January 2025. Independent risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. A nomogram was constructed. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling. Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP), placental growth factor (PLGF), fibrinogen (FIB), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were independent risk factors (SBP: OR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.035-1.095; PLGF: OR = 0.967, 95% CI: 0.953-0.979; FIB: OR = 0.435, 95% CI: 0.294-0.625; AST: OR = 1.060, 95% CI: 1.025-1.097; all P < 0.01). The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.888 (95% CI: 0.833-0.944), with a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80.1%. The bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.885. An exploratory risk stratification based on PLGF and FIB classified patients into low- (0.7%), moderate- (9.1%), and high-risk (45.2%) groups (P for trend < 0.001). Conclusion: The preliminary four-factor predictive tool shows promising internal performance. However, due to the lack of external validation and modest sample size, these findings are hypothesis-generating. External validation in large, multicenter prospective cohorts is required before clinical application.

Indexed as

internal validationnomogramplacental abruptionpreeclampsiapreliminary predictive toolrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42719079
PMCPMC13555334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.