ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
A post-quantum verified self-healing framework for healthcare IoT systems: deep anomaly detection, severity estimation and risk-aware rollback to trusted checkpoints.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stronger defense mechanisms are needed for the safety of healthcare IoT systems, for faster detection and smooth recovery from cyber-attacks, without disrupting services. This study addresses the need to safeguard healthcare IoT systems through efficient detection of potential anomalies leveraging the capacities of deep learning, and also rolling back the system to the safest checkpoint in the recent past, verified using post-quantum verification using ML-DSA/CRYSTALS-Dilithium. A two-tier architecture is proposed in this study with deep anomaly detection and attack severity analysis in the first tier, and post-quantum verification for selecting a policy-driven safe rollback point based on multi-factor assessment, with due consideration of risks. The reinforcement learning-based framework is used in the checkpoint selection phase that selects the checkpoint with the best Q-Score. The model is implemented over two prominent HIoT network datasets-WUSTL EHMS 2020 and CIC IoMT 2024. The model is evaluated using anomaly detection metrics (attack probability, confidence score, severity analysis, and recovery uptime), trust score, verification latency, recovery time, rollback quality, and performance metrics (F1-score, false-positive rate, precision, and recall). The proposed model achieved strong overall performance across both healthcare IoT datasets, with average values of 59.23% attack probability, 94.00% confidence, 5.61% anomaly score, 69.50% severity, 26.61 ns recovery time, 75.86% trust score, 98.37% uptime, 72.93% rollback quality, 11.28 ns verification latency, 98.37% F1-score, 98.28% recall, 98.4% precision, and 0.045% false positive rate. The proposed model effectively and accurately detects an attack and proposes the suitable recovery method-micro rollback, medium rollback, or complete rollback- based on the attack severity analysis. Better system uptime is ensured by selecting recent and trustworthy checkpoints to roll back based on post-quantum verification and combined trust score calculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.