Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Pretreatment myopia progression is associated with the response to 0.01% atropine: a

Shi-Fei Wei, Wei-Ling Bai, Yun-Yun Sun, Wen-Zai An, Xin-Tong Liang, Jia-He Gan, Zhi-Ning Cai, Qian-Qian Song, Shi-Ming Li, Ning-Li Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shi-Fei Wei *Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei-Ling Bai *Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yun-Yun SunBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wen-Zai AnBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xin-Tong LiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jia-He GanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Ning CaiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qian-Qian SongBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shi-Ming LiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ning-Li WangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine which subgroup of children would best benefit from 0.01% atropine eyedrop. Methods: This Results: After 1 year of 0.01% atropine treatment, SEP was -0.37 ± 0.23 D, -0.57 ± 0.38 D, and -0.68 ± 0.49 D in the slow, moderate, and fast progression groups (P = 0.17). The group with faster SEP during the first year still showed faster SEP after treatment. The reduction of SEP (SEP of the second year minus SEP of the first year) in the moderate group was more than that in the slow group (0.22 ± 0.37 D vs. -0.10 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.007); the fast group was more than that in the slow group (0.57 ± 0.55 D vs. -0.10 ± 0.21 D, P < 0.001) and the moderate group (0.57 ± 0.55 D vs. 0.22 ± 0.37 D, P = 0.02). Faster SEP before treatment is related to the reduction efficiency (β = -0.5, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Faster SEP before treatment is associated with a better treatment response to 0.01% atropine eye drops, with greater reduction in SEP after treatment. However, no significant association was found between baseline progression and axial elongation changes. Children with slow SEP cannot get significant myopia control benefit from 1-year 0.01% atropine treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier ChiCTR-IOR-17013898.

Indexed as

0.01% atropine eye dropschildrenmyopia progressionpersonalized myopia managementpost hoc analysis

Identifiers

PMID42719043
PMCPMC13555208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.