ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Post-gaming return to reality: a key factor in predicting the positive and negative outcomes of escapism.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Escapism is a key gaming motive associated with both psychological relief and Gaming Disorder (GD). Yet, existing models often neglect the dynamic role of goal attainment shaping gaming outcomes. Drawing on Goal Systems Theory, we introduce the construct of Post-Gaming Return (PGR)-a state reflecting successful psychological transition from gameplay to real life-as a potential explanatory mechanism of adaptive and maladaptive escapist play. Methods: Two studies were conducted with active gamers (Study 1: N = 259; Study 2: N = 193). Participants completed the PGR scale along with validated measures of escapism, mood, need satisfaction and frustration, vitality, life satisfaction, and GD symptoms. Regression analyses tested the predictive and discriminant validity of PGR across samples. Results: PGR was positively associated with post-game positive mood and need satisfaction, and negatively with negative mood and need frustration. In both studies, PGR was associated with higher vitality and lower GD symptoms beyond escapism motives. The two PGR subscales-ease of disengagement from the game and ease of re-engagement in daily activities-differentially predicted outcomes: disengagement was the strongest negative predictor of GD, while re-engagement was associated with vitality and life satisfaction. In Study 2, PGR showed weak associations with general mood and apathy. Across samples, PGR and IGD were strongly related but better represented as distinct latent factors, and PGR explained additional variance in several adaptive and maladaptive outcomes beyond IGD symptoms. Conclusion: The findings support a shift from static motivation-based models toward a dynamic goal-resolution framework. PGR captures key post-gaming processes and may help distinguish between more adaptive and more maladaptive forms of escapist play. It offers a novel tool for assessing post-game regulatory disengagement in gaming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.