ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Navigating self-injury in a digital world: adolescents' perspectives on coping, help-seeking, and technology.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), hereafter referred to as self-injury, is common among adolescents and is associated with elevated risk for suicide attempts and other adverse mental health outcomes. Because most adolescents who self-injure do not receive formal treatment, accessible alternatives are needed. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) may offer an accessible and scalable means of support. While previous research has examined DMHIs for youth, less is known about how adolescents who engage in self-injury understand their experiences and use digital technologies, including emerging tools such as artificial intelligence (AI), to support their mental health. This study explored adolescents' lived experiences of self-injury, help-seeking behaviors, and technology use for coping and support. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews between May 2024 and April 2025 with 21 adolescents (14-18 years old) with lived experience of self-injury. Recruitment occurred through a mental health screener hosted on a large national mental health nonprofit's website. Interviews explored adolescent experiences with self-injury, barriers to seeking help, and the role of digital tools in their self-injury self-management. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via thematic analysis. Results: Adolescents described self-injury as a coping strategy embedded within broader emotional and social stressors. While they were aware of the harms, they commonly expressed ambivalence about stopping the behavior. Stigma and concerns about disclosure often limited help-seeking and contributed to their use of digital technologies to access information and support. Participants reported using a range of tools, including music streaming platforms, journaling and mood-tracking apps, online communities, and AI systems such as ChatGPT to regulate emotions, reflect on their experiences, seek advice, and discuss sensitive topics. Although these technologies were valued for their accessibility, privacy, and immediacy, participants also highlighted limitations, including inaccurate or generic AI responses, limited moderation in online communities, and the complex emotional impacts of music. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the complex and evolving role digital technologies, including AI, play in adolescents' experiences of self-injury, coping, and help-seeking. These insights have important implications for the development of future interventions and for clinicians, caregivers, and other health professionals supporting adolescents' mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.