Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719014›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Biologic and targeted synthetic therapies in ankylosing spondylitis: a pharmacological review.

Omar Z Ameer, Reem Temsah, Yara O Alsouss, Raghad Al-Amoudi, Mohammad A Khanfar, Ibrahim M Salman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omar Z AmeerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reem TemsahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yara O AlsoussDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raghad Al-AmoudiDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Northeastern University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mohammad A KhanfarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim M SalmanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a prototypical axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) defined by chronic inflammatory back pain, progressive spinal stiffness, and frequent extra-articular manifestations such as acute anterior uveitis (21%-33%), inflammatory bowel disease (5%-10%), and psoriasis (4%-13%). Management has shifted from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to highly targeted biologic and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This comprehensive review focuses on the current evidence for biologic and targeted synthetic therapeutics in the management of AS, emphasizing mechanisms of action, regulatory approvals, dosing regimens, and clinical efficacy. Three major therapeutic classes are identified: two biologic DMARD classes, comprising tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors and interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors, and the targeted synthetic DMARDs, namely, the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) inhibitors. TNF inhibitors (adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, golimumab, certolizumab pegol) typically achieve Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% improvement (ASAS40) rates of 40%-58% at 12-24 weeks

Indexed as

ankylosing spondylitisbiologicsIL-17 inhibitorsJAK inhibitorstargeted synthetic DMARDsTNF inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID42719014
PMCPMC13553827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.