Articlei-Perception
Regions of symmetry in images of natural scenes and artworks.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While established as an important contributor to shape or pattern "goodness," mirror symmetry has yet to be extensively studied in complex images more closely resembling our everyday visual surroundings. With this work, we provide insights into symmetry detection and its underlying processes using a novel bounding-box method on 200 images of natural scenes and 200 images of artworks. In a large online study, 901 participants were asked to indicate regions of symmetry within each image by placing a rectangular bounding box on the image, adjusting it to the region of symmetry they perceived, and marking one of the two axes of the rectangle as the main symmetry axis. They could do this for as many boxes as they saw fit, and they could also use the same bounding box to mark both orthogonal axes in case of double symmetries. For every box, participants also rated the saliency of the region as well as the perceived strength of the symmetry. Next to these behavioral tasks, we asked participants in a separate block to rate the aesthetic appeal of the images. Our new method replicates the previously established dominance of vertical axes of symmetry in dot-patterns and geometric shapes in real-world images. Moreover, we noted a decrease in salience, symmetry strength, and size with the number of boxes within an image. We present the results in relation to our hypotheses and discuss their contribution to the broader literature on symmetry and aesthetics, including a comparison between human and machine vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.