ReviewSAGE open nursing
Midwives' and Nurse Midwives' Autonomy Experience in Caring for Laboring Women in Health Facilities: A Systematic Review With Metasynthesis.
Review in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization emphasizes the autonomy of Midwives and Nurse Midwives in physiological care during childbirth. Despite international regulation of competencies, the expression of autonomy isn't consistent, potentially creating inconsistencies in clinical care and professional identity. The objective was to synthesize evidence on the experiences of Midwives and Nurse Midwives regarding autonomy in caring for laboring women in health facilities. Methods: Systematic review with metasynthesis, according to the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute, carried out by meta-aggregation. Nine platforms and databases were searched for primary studies published from 2016/2024 in English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese. The selection of studies followed the PRISMA guidelines. Sixteen articles met the eligibility and methodological quality criteria. Registered protocol in PROSPERO. Results: Three categories emerged: (a) autonomy as a context of safety and confidence, (b) autonomy as a process of strengthening identity, and (c) autonomy as a reflection of expertise. These generated the meta-category: The dynamics of Midwives/Nurse Midwives' autonomy. Conclusion: The autonomy of Midwives and Nurse Midwives in "being and doing" affirms their identity, expresses their expertise, and promotes the confidence and safety of laboring women. Autonomous Midwives and Nurse Midwives make childbirth a unique and unrepeatable event while defending physiological care. Recognizing the autonomy of Midwives and Nurse Midwives strengthens global health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.