Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718927›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering

Virtual treadmill technology (C-mill) in gait rehabilitation after stroke: A qualitative interview study.

Kristiansen Sara, Lahelle Falck Andreas, Wouda Matthijs Ferdinand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristiansen SaraDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Lahelle Falck AndreasActive Clinic, Lillehammer, Norway.
Wouda Matthijs FerdinandDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9381-4043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In stroke rehabilitation, VR-based technologies like the C-Mill treadmill combine physical and cognitive training to enhance motivation and motor learning. While quantitative studies show functional benefits, little is known about patients' experiences. Aim: This study aims to explore stroke survivors' subjective experiences of motivation during C-Mill training. Method: A qualitative design was employed. Seven inpatients at Sunnaas Hospital who had engaged in gait rehabilitation with C-Mill participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using systematic text condensation. Results: One overarching theme - motivation - was identified, comprising two subthemes: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The patients described how the C-Mill fostered intrinsic motivation by providing challenging, meaningful, and engaging activities that reflected everyday-life situations. They experienced that the system encouraged them to push their limits and attempt tasks they might otherwise hesitate to try, while still feeling supported and safe. Additionally, the technology enhanced extrinsic motivation through engaging feedback mechanisms, including gamification elements, and the visualization of performance statistics. Conclusion: C-Mill appears to constitute a promising adjunct to conventional rehabilitation by strengthening motivation. Its technological features, including safety scaffolding, gamification, and task variability, appeared to facilitate engagement and promote motivation.

Indexed as

C-millmotivationpatient experiencerehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID42718927
PMCPMC13554542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.