ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2026
From bench to bedside: Overcoming translational hurdles in nanoparticle research with pharmacokinetic modeling.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticles represent a major advancement in drug delivery, enhancing stability, solubility, and targeted delivery while reducing non-specific toxicity. Despite promising preclinical results, few nanoparticle platforms have successfully translated to clinical use due to limited pharmacokinetic (PK) data, off-target effects, manufacturing complexity, and a lack of long-term studies. Emphasizing the pivotal role of PK in this development process is essential for harnessing the full therapeutic potential of nanoparticle applications in clinical practice. In this review, we introduce the concept of model-informed nanoparticle development (MIND), an extension of model-informed drug development (MIDD) principles to nanomedicine that integrates knowledge of nanoparticle interactions with biological systems and state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic modeling to support evidence-based decision-making. Physiologically-based PK (PBPK) models simulate the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) of nanoparticles within the body, incorporating physiological parameters to predict their PK behavior. Population-based PK (PopPK) models utilize population variability to characterize nanoparticle PK across diverse patient groups, optimizing dosing strategies and personalized medicine approaches. Mechanistic models elucidate the intricate interactions between nanoparticles and biological systems, integrating cellular pathways and disease mechanisms to predict therapeutic outcomes and guide nanoparticle design. Through the MIND framework, these modeling approaches can enhance our understanding of nanoparticle PK, foster innovation in active agent delivery systems, and accelerate nanoparticle translation from research to clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.