ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy using ultrasonic bone curette yields fewer durotomies, decreased blood loss: a single surgeon's retrospective experience.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a three column deformity correction technique that can achieve 30 to 40 degrees of correction and is best used for patients with severe rigid sagittal imbalances. Patients report a high degree of satisfaction with quality of life outcomes as a consequence of undergoing PSO. However, complications range between 12% and 40%, including dural tears or neurovascular injuries causing neurological deficit occurring as a consequence of high speed drilling or traction from the spooned retractors used to facilitate exposure. Ultrasonic bone curettes may provide a safer alternative to the drill and retractor approach. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes between newer spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage and traditional high speed drilling with paravertebral spoon retractors for pedicle subtraction osteotomies. Methods: All patients undergoing PSO with a single surgeon across two academic health institutions in the past eight years were reviewed. Preoperative variables obtained were demographics, prior spine surgeries, and etiology, while intraoperative predictor variables were ultrasonic bone curettage use and number of fused levels. The principal outcomes were surgical: duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), incidence of durotomies, and neurovascular injury. Secondary outcomes were postoperative: length of stay, need for revision surgery, minor complications, and major complications. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with binary outcomes, while multiple linear regression evaluated correlations with continuous outcomes. Results: Overall, 175 patients were reviewed. In this sample, 89 (51%) had prior surgeries, and 45 (26%) were treated with the ultrasonic bone curettage. Intraoperatively, the mean EBL was 1,105 mL (range, 350-3,000 mL), 29 (17%) of participants sustained durotomies, 14 (8%) experienced neurovascular injury, and the mean duration of surgery was 401 mins (range, 135-695 mins). Postoperatively, 35 (20%) experienced minor complications, 25 (14%) experienced major complications, and mean length of stay was 11 days (range, 2-80 days). Ultrasonic bone curettage use correlated with decreased blood loss (β =-270 mL, P=0.004) and was associated with decreased incidence of durotomy [odds ratio (OR) =0.29, P=0.042]. Conclusions: Use of spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage in PSO was associated with significantly less blood loss and fewer durotomies compared to traditional drilling in this single surgeon's multi-institutional experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.