Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718859›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy using ultrasonic bone curette yields fewer durotomies, decreased blood loss: a single surgeon's retrospective experience.

Benjamin S Succop, Elias Mohammad, Stephen M Bergin, Andrew Abumoussa, Aaron Gelinne, Brett Rocos, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr, Deb Bhowmick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin S SuccopDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2266-3767
Elias MohammadDuke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.
Stephen M BerginDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Andrew AbumoussaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Aaron GelinneDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Brett RocosDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Muhammad M Abd-El-BarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Deb BhowmickDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a three column deformity correction technique that can achieve 30 to 40 degrees of correction and is best used for patients with severe rigid sagittal imbalances. Patients report a high degree of satisfaction with quality of life outcomes as a consequence of undergoing PSO. However, complications range between 12% and 40%, including dural tears or neurovascular injuries causing neurological deficit occurring as a consequence of high speed drilling or traction from the spooned retractors used to facilitate exposure. Ultrasonic bone curettes may provide a safer alternative to the drill and retractor approach. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes between newer spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage and traditional high speed drilling with paravertebral spoon retractors for pedicle subtraction osteotomies. Methods: All patients undergoing PSO with a single surgeon across two academic health institutions in the past eight years were reviewed. Preoperative variables obtained were demographics, prior spine surgeries, and etiology, while intraoperative predictor variables were ultrasonic bone curettage use and number of fused levels. The principal outcomes were surgical: duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), incidence of durotomies, and neurovascular injury. Secondary outcomes were postoperative: length of stay, need for revision surgery, minor complications, and major complications. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with binary outcomes, while multiple linear regression evaluated correlations with continuous outcomes. Results: Overall, 175 patients were reviewed. In this sample, 89 (51%) had prior surgeries, and 45 (26%) were treated with the ultrasonic bone curettage. Intraoperatively, the mean EBL was 1,105 mL (range, 350-3,000 mL), 29 (17%) of participants sustained durotomies, 14 (8%) experienced neurovascular injury, and the mean duration of surgery was 401 mins (range, 135-695 mins). Postoperatively, 35 (20%) experienced minor complications, 25 (14%) experienced major complications, and mean length of stay was 11 days (range, 2-80 days). Ultrasonic bone curettage use correlated with decreased blood loss (β =-270 mL, P=0.004) and was associated with decreased incidence of durotomy [odds ratio (OR) =0.29, P=0.042]. Conclusions: Use of spoonless ultrasonic bone curettage in PSO was associated with significantly less blood loss and fewer durotomies compared to traditional drilling in this single surgeon's multi-institutional experience.

Indexed as

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO)surgical outcomesultrasonic bone curette

Identifiers

PMID42718859
PMCPMC13554306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.