Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718847›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2026

Individualized pharmacotherapy: background and development.

Jan Trøst Jørgensen, Niels Westergaard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan Trøst JørgensenDx-Rx Institute, Fredensborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6255-0006
Niels WestergaardUniversity College Absalon, Centre for Health, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2663-8040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most drug prescriptions are still based on empiricism and not on solid biological data, which often results in considerable patient variability and, sometimes, low patient benefits. Although variability in patient response to pharmacotherapy has long been recognized, only in recent decades have new molecule analytical methods provided insight into some of the causes, which are often related to somatic or germline genetic variations. Based on this insight, different predictive biomarker tests have been developed to optimize and individualize pharmacotherapy. These biomarker tests are classified as companion diagnostic (CDx) or pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests. In both the United States and Europe, CDx and PGx information is part of the regulatory drug labeling and is included in the Prescribing Information for the individual drugs and biologics. In the United States, this type of information is found in the labeling of more than 400 regulatory-approved drugs and biological products. Despite these measures and the documented clinical utility of CDx and PGx testing, clinical implementation is lagging, especially with regard to PGx. There are various reasons for the lack of testing, such as insufficient education and awareness among healthcare professionals, inadequate access to biomarker testing, regulatory hurdles, and insufficient reimbursements. Although progress has been made in recent years, further efforts are needed to fully realize the potential of individualized pharmacotherapy by integrating the use of predictive biomarkers into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs)companion diagnostic (CDx)pharmacogenetic tests (PGx tests)Pharmacotherapypredictive biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42718847
PMCPMC13554339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.