ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
SEED-Net: statistical echo evidence and detail modeling for ultrasound lesion classification across multiple organ-specific datasets.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Discriminative information in ultrasound images is often manifested as local boundary changes, internal echo heterogeneity and differences in fine-scale structure. However, it is susceptible to interference from speckle and uncorrelated background responses. This paper proposed the Statistical Echo Evidence and Detail Network (SEED-Net) for ultrasound lesion classification across multiple organ-specific datasets. Methods: SEED-Net comprises Foreground Tissue Gate, Guided Detail Unit, Channel Recalibration and Statistical Echo Evidence Head, which are used, respectively, for modulating the response of foreground tissue, modelling residuals of local structure and detail, recalibrating channel features, and fusing statistical evidence from medium and deep layers. Each prior branch uses a near-zero gate so that its initial contribution to the residual backbone is approximately zero. The model was trained on three ultrasound datasets, TN5000, SMC-LUD and PU2756, for the classification of ultrasound images of thyroid nodules, liver lesions and lung tumours, respectively. All experiments utilised whole-image input, random initialisation and independent training with five random seeds, and the model was compared with convolutional networks, visual transformers, hybrid architectures and visual state-space models. Results: SEED-Net achieved accuracy values of 0.8702 ± 0.0055, 0.9851 ± 0.0075, and 0.6054 ± 0.0086 on TN5000, SMC-LUD, and PU2756, respectively, with corresponding Macro F1-scores of 0.8384 ± 0.0048, 0.9850 ± 0.0075, and 0.5785 ± 0.0229. It achieved the highest or joint-highest Macro F1-score among the evaluated learning-based models on all three datasets, although its absolute performance on PU2756 remained limited. Ablation experiments demonstrate that the modelling of local details in the backbone and the statistical evidence classification head play complementary roles. Grad-CAM visualisations showed more compact activation patterns around lesion-related regions in the displayed examples, providing qualitative observations of the model responses. Conclusion: By integrating local detail modelling with multi-layer statistical evidence, SEED-Net achieves a favourable balance between performance and computational complexity in ultrasound classification tasks across different organs and varying levels of difficulty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.