Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718788›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026

Evaluation of print angle on accuracy of 3D printed dental models.

Aarthi Chand, Hashmi K M, K Saidath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aarthi ChandNitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Mangalore, India.
Hashmi K MNitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Mangalore, India.
K SaidathNitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Mangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Additive manufacturing, introduced by Charles Hull through stereolithography, enables the fabrication of three-dimensional (3D) structures with high precision by curing material layer by layer. In dentistry, print orientation significantly influences the dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties of 3D-printed models used for surgical splints, aligners, drill guides, and other orthodontic applications. This study evaluated the effect of different print orientations on the dimensional accuracy of maxillary and mandibular dental models fabricated using a Digital Light Processing (DLP) printer. Aim and objective: To evaluate the effect of different 3D printing angles on the dimensional accuracy of dental models fabricated using a Digital Light Processing (DLP) printer. Materials and methods: Type IV gypsum dental casts were scanned using the 3Shape OrthoAnalyzer and printed at four orientations (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) using a DLP printer. The printed models were washed, post-cured, rescanned, and digitally superimposed onto the original scans to assess dimensional accuracy. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's Results: Print orientation significantly affected the dimensional accuracy of maxillary models, with significant differences observed among selected orientation groups. No significant differences were found among mandibular models printed at different orientations. Significant differences were also observed between maxillary and mandibular models printed at 30° and 60°. Conclusion: Maxillary models printed at 30° and 60° demonstrated greater dimensional accuracy than those printed at 0° and 90°. Although print orientation influenced accuracy, all deviations were within clinically acceptable limits, indicating that orientation may be selected based on clinical requirements, printing time, resin usage, and build platform efficiency.

Indexed as

3D printingbuild orientationdental modelsdimensional accuracyprint angle

Identifiers

PMID42718788
PMCPMC13553454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.