ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Evaluation of print angle on accuracy of 3D printed dental models.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Additive manufacturing, introduced by Charles Hull through stereolithography, enables the fabrication of three-dimensional (3D) structures with high precision by curing material layer by layer. In dentistry, print orientation significantly influences the dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties of 3D-printed models used for surgical splints, aligners, drill guides, and other orthodontic applications. This study evaluated the effect of different print orientations on the dimensional accuracy of maxillary and mandibular dental models fabricated using a Digital Light Processing (DLP) printer. Aim and objective: To evaluate the effect of different 3D printing angles on the dimensional accuracy of dental models fabricated using a Digital Light Processing (DLP) printer. Materials and methods: Type IV gypsum dental casts were scanned using the 3Shape OrthoAnalyzer and printed at four orientations (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) using a DLP printer. The printed models were washed, post-cured, rescanned, and digitally superimposed onto the original scans to assess dimensional accuracy. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's Results: Print orientation significantly affected the dimensional accuracy of maxillary models, with significant differences observed among selected orientation groups. No significant differences were found among mandibular models printed at different orientations. Significant differences were also observed between maxillary and mandibular models printed at 30° and 60°. Conclusion: Maxillary models printed at 30° and 60° demonstrated greater dimensional accuracy than those printed at 0° and 90°. Although print orientation influenced accuracy, all deviations were within clinically acceptable limits, indicating that orientation may be selected based on clinical requirements, printing time, resin usage, and build platform efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.