ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Early acquisition efficiency in visual-to-auditory sensory substitution: the role of structured learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Visual-to-auditory sensory substitution converts visual information into structured sound patterns when visual input is unavailable, impaired, or experimentally restricted, thereby supporting access to information otherwise conveyed visually. Its perceptual usability depends jointly on the sensory-conversion scheme that encodes visual information into sound and on the learning conditions under which learners acquire sound-visual mappings through learning and experience. Although prior visual-to-auditory sensory-substitution studies have often evaluated substituted coding schemes or learning approaches primarily through endpoint learnability or recognition accuracy, endpoint performance alone does not characterize the temporal cost and efficiency with which usable perceptual decoding emerges during learning. Methods: This study examined whether structured learning based on information-processing principles was associated with more efficient early acquisition of sound-visual mappings in a controlled perceptual-learning model with a constant visual-to-auditory mapping framework. Acquisition-phase behavioral records from 63 blindfolded sighted adults who completed a randomized visual-to-auditory sensory-substitution learning experiment were analyzed, with 31 and 32 participants in the structured-learning and control conditions, respectively. The outcomes included correct-trial response time, total learning time, response-time variability, and inverse efficiency score. Results: Compared with the control condition, structured learning was associated with shorter correct-trial response time, lower total learning time, and lower inverse efficiency score, without a meaningful between-group difference in response-time variability. These patterns remained evident across robustness analyses and after adjustment for baseline pre-test performance. Exploratory schedule-derived analyses suggested that structured learning provided denser repeated exposure and a more staged introduction of sensory mappings. Discussion: Together, these behavioral-log findings indicate that structured learning was associated with more efficient early acquisition of sound-visual mappings and suggest that acquisition efficiency in sensory-substitution learning may be related to how those mappings are sequenced and repeated during learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.