Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718769›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Topical compound acid peeling remodels scalp microbiota and lipid homeostasis in seborrheic dermatitis: a multi-omics study.

Hongyan Zhang, Yetan Shi, Lifang Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongyan ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yetan ShiThe Fourth Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lifang HuDepartment of Dermatology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current therapeutic options for scalp seborrheic dermatitis (SSD) remain suboptimal, highlighting the demand for more effective and safe treatment strategies. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of a novel 7.5% five-acid compound formulation for the treatment of SSD. Methods: A total of 319 patients diagnosed with SSD at the dermatology outpatient clinic were enrolled. All patients received four sessions of scalp compound acid therapy and were included in efficacy and safety analyses. A subgroup of 30 male participants from the 319-patient cohort underwent scalp sampling before and after treatment for combined microbiomic and lipidomic detection. Meanwhile, 10 matched male SSD patients who did not received compound acid therapy were enrolled as the control group for multi-omics analyses. Results: All 319 SSD patients presented marked relief of scalp erythema, scaling and pruritus after repeated compound acid treatment, with only 6 individuals experiencing temporary mild scalp irritation after the initial treatment. Integrated microbiomic and lipidomic analyses were restricted to a male subcohort (30 treated patients and 10 matched untreated male SSD controls). Within this male subgroup, the relative abundance of the genus Conclusion: The topical scalp compound acid therapy effectively alleviates clinical symptoms in SSD patients and represents a promising novel therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

compound acid peelingefficacylipidomeMalasseziamicrobiomesafetyscalp seborrheic dermatitisStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID42718769
PMCPMC13553927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.