ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Beyond standardized measures: a mixed-methods pilot study of integrated non-cognitive skills training in German upper secondary students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-cognitive skills such as growth mindset, grit, self-discipline, self-efficacy, and resilience have been identified as modifiable psychological resources supporting academic functioning, yet few interventions address multiple non-cognitive skills simultaneously and evidence for integrated programs remains limited. This pilot study examined the feasibility and preliminary effects of a 1-day training addressing all five constructs among German upper secondary school students across Kirkpatrick's four evaluation levels. Methods: Using a quasi-experimental mixed-methods design, Results: Participants rated the training positively and showed high knowledge scores at posttest; ratings of perceived application and usefulness were substantially lower at follow-up than at posttest, although the two administrations differed in framing; and neither the targeted constructs nor academic grades changed significantly, consistent with limited statistical power. Qualitative findings extended these results: participants reported deeper conceptual learning, revised attributional beliefs, and selectively maintained self-regulatory strategies. Discussion: Overall, integrated non-cognitive skills training proved feasible within the regular school schedule, but qualitative and quantitative data yielded partially different conclusions, with interviews revealing continued strategy use and conceptual learning that standardized measures did not capture. The pronounced decline in perceived transfer highlights the need for booster sessions or curricular integration to sustain effects, and the observed effect sizes provide a foundation for planning adequately powered confirmatory trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.