Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718748›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026

Three-dimensional rotational angiography-based multimodal fusion imaging for preoperative neurovascular assessment in intracranial meningiomas: a retrospective technical feasibility study of 72 cases.

Yue Ma, Zhouyang Zhao, Yimei Yang, Xiaobin Zhang, Shifeng Deng, Lijin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yue MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhouyang ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yimei YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaobin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shifeng DengDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lijin HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Surgical management of anatomically complex intracranial meningiomas requires accurate assessment of tumor vascular supply, venous sinus involvement, cortical venous relationships, and skull base anatomy. Although multimodal fusion imaging and angiographic assessment are established, the incremental role and appropriate use of arterial- and venous-phase three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA)-based multimodal fusion imaging (MFI) remain uncertain. We evaluated the technical feasibility, anatomical information yield, and potential decision-support utility of this workflow. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 72 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed intracranial meningiomas who underwent microsurgical resection with preoperative 3DRA-based MFI between May 2023 and March 2026. Preoperative imaging datasets included contrast-enhanced three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), thin-section computed tomography (CT), and arterial- and venous-phase 3DRA. These datasets were fused to generate patient-specific three-dimensional models for surgical planning, neurovascular mapping, early intraoperative anatomical orientation, and postoperative assessment. Simpson grade I-II resection, perioperative complications, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-related complications were recorded. Results: Among the 72 patients, 35 tumors were located at the skull base and 37 were non-skull base meningiomas. Venous sinus involvement was identified in 24 patients, pial arterial supply in 14 patients, and meningeal arterial supply in 54 patients. Abnormal vascular findings were detected in 10 patients, including 9 aneurysms and 1 arterial occlusion. Simpson grade I-II resection was achieved in 67 patients (93.1%), and perioperative complications occurred in 5 patients (6.9%). No DSA-related complications were observed. In exploratory subgroup analyses, no statistically significant differences in resection or complication rates were observed according to angiographically defined vascular involvement or tumor location. Conclusion: 3DRA-based MFI is a feasible adjunct for patient-specific neurovascular and skull base assessment in selected patients with anatomically complex intracranial meningiomas. Its potential value may be greatest in skull base, hypervascular, vessel-adjacent, and venous sinus-related tumors when detailed vascular information may influence surgical or embolization planning. Because this retrospective study lacked a control group and did not prospectively assess management changes, operative efficiency, functional outcomes, or cost-effectiveness, it does not establish superiority over noninvasive imaging or support routine use in all meningioma patients. Future prospective comparative studies should include an appropriate conventional-imaging control group, prospectively document management plans before and after review of the fusion images, and assess predefined operative, functional, safety, and cost-effectiveness outcomes to determine the incremental clinical value of this approach.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyImaging, Three-DimensionalMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMultimodal ImagingAdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRetrospective Studies3D rotational angiographyintracranial meningiomamultimodal fusion imagingneurovascular mappingskull basesurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID42718748
PMCPMC13553429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.