ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Applying the NIMHD research framework to assess research capacity: lessons and adaptations for use.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework illustrates that health and health disparities are shaped by a complex interplay of factors that operate across multiple domains and levels of influence. We sought to apply the framework in a novel way, to examine and inform the collective work of an academic research center focused on health promotion and disease prevention. Center investigators independently mapped their research onto a grid crossing five domains (biological, behavioral, physical/ built environment, sociocultural environment, healthcare system) and four levels of influence (individual, interpersonal, community, societal). We describe and reflect on two mapping exercises as a use case to strengthen practical application of the framework for research planning and evaluation. We also highlight key questions that emerged during implementation and propose potential adaptations to improve the framework's utility for interdisciplinary teams working to address health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.