ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A journey mapping study of healthcare professionals' involvement in fertility preservation for cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Based on journey mapping, this study aimed to identify the main tasks, key pain points, and emotional experiences of healthcare professionals throughout their involvement in fertility preservation for cancer patients, and to provide evidence for designing targeted interventions and optimizing fertility preservation services. Methods: This qualitative study adopted purposive sampling to recruit 24 healthcare professionals from the departments of breast and thyroid surgery, oncology, and related departments at Yichang Central People's Hospital between June and August 2025. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis guided data coding and analysis. A journey map was then constructed. Results: The journey map of healthcare professionals' engagement in cancer patients' fertility preservation consisted of four stages: needs identification and topic communication, option assessment and referral, intervention and treatment, and long-term follow-up. Analysis of the interview data yielded 14 themes. The key pain points included insufficient knowledge, ambiguous role perception, the sensitivity of reproductive discussions, constrained medical resources, inadequate multidisciplinary collaboration, and gaps in follow-up care. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals acknowledge the importance of fertility preservation for cancer patients, yet they encounter multiple obstacles in clinical practice, such as deficiencies in professional knowledge and skills, weak interdisciplinary collaboration, and limitations in resources and policies. A multilevel intervention strategy should be developed through measures such as creating standardized assessment tools, building regional collaborative networks, strengthening knowledge and skill training with clear role definitions, improving cross-departmental information sharing, and prioritizing follow-up care. These efforts can enhance healthcare professionals' engagement in fertility preservation and improve the quality of survival for cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.