ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Uncertainty-aware federated temporal learning with explainable LLM-based coaching for privacy-preserving wearable health systems.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The growing use of wearable sensors enables continuous health and activity monitoring; however, challenges such as noisy data, privacy concerns, and device heterogeneity limit the effectiveness of centralized learning systems. This paper presents a privacy-first, AI-enhanced lifestyle coaching framework that integrates multi-stage signal cleaning, federated learning (FL), and explainable large language models (LLMs) with structured prompting for intelligent, decentralized health guidance. Unlike prior FL-based human activity recognition (HAR) systems, this work introduces (i) a quantitatively validated multi-stage denoising pipeline, (ii) local latent-space semantic imputation under federated constraints, and (iii) an explainable LLM-based coaching layer whose reasoning is explicitly grounded in aggregated federated activity representations rather than raw sensor data. Methods: The proposed system employs a robust preprocessing pipeline comprising Hampel filtering, adaptive wavelet-Butterworth denoising, Variational Autoencoder (VAE)-based semantic imputation, and Kalman smoothing. The cleaned signals are used to train highly efficient Deep LSTM models on-device, and local updates are aggregated using a FedProx-based framework to mitigate client drift and preserve data privacy. To ensure rigorous evaluation and eliminate temporal data leakage, strict chronological data splitting is enforced alongside a 50% overlap stride constraint. Results: The multi-stage signal cleaning pipeline successfully achieved a 7-10 dB improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Under the strict evaluation conditions, the global federated model established a highly realistic, leak-free baseline, achieving an average global accuracy of 68.08% and a Macro-F1 score of 0.60 on highly imbalanced, strictly unseen future time-series data. Furthermore, the LLM-based coaching module achieved a faithfulness score of 0.87. Discussion: The high faithfulness of the coaching module proves that high-level, uncertainty-aware summaries are sufficient to generate personalized, transparent, and context-aware lifestyle recommendations without ever exposing raw sensor streams. Overall, the integration of uncertainty-aware signal preprocessing, federated temporal modeling, and explainable LLM-driven coaching establishes a mathematically sound, scalable, and secure architecture for next-generation AI-driven health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.