Observational studyFrontiers in neurology2026
Clinical presentation and engagement with a cognitive rehabilitation clinic in individuals reporting anomalous health incidents.
Observational study in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Department of Defense is working to establish effective rehabilitative management options for individuals who have experienced Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI). Methods: This retrospective, observational study conducted at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center describes the clinical presentation of forty patients (21 female and 19 male; mean [SD] age, 43.3 [9.2] years) with reported AHI. It also describes the application of a cognitive training intervention, its utilization, patient satisfaction, and changes in cognitive performance and symptoms over time. At baseline, the overall pattern of objective cognitive efficiency scores was within normal limits, though numerically below healthy norms. However, patients performed below normal limits on measures of processing speed. Patient self-report surveys found slightly elevated psychological symptoms, highly elevated neurobehavioral and headache symptoms, and severe impact on life. Results: Patients used an at-home cognitive training program and provided generally positive feedback regarding the program. On an internal clinic survey, over 75% of the patients felt that participation helped in areas of memory, visuo-spatial skills, and attention. Some changes in objective cognitive testing were observed over time. Self-reported symptoms, which were not directly targeted in the intervention, did not change over time. Discussion: This study demonstrates that the clinical integration of targeted cognitive training for individuals reporting cognitive symptoms following an AHI is feasible and acceptable, with patients demonstrating good engagement and a positive clinical trajectory in cognitive efficiency over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.