ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Multi-view AI output variability as a teaching resource in a micro-course for thyroid TI-RADS interpretation among ultrasound residents: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Thyroid TI-RADS interpretation requires integration of sonographic features across image planes, yet routine teaching often emphasizes the final category more than the cross-plane reasoning process. We evaluated whether a structured micro-course using multi-view AI output variability as a teaching resource could improve TI-RADS interpretation among ultrasound residents. Methods: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 52 ultrasound residents were randomized 1:1 to either a structured micro-course using multi-view AI output variability as a teaching resource or time-matched conventional TI-RADS teaching. The primary outcome was participant-level TI-RADS interpretation accuracy at baseline (T0), immediately after teaching (T1), and 4 weeks later (T2). Secondary outcomes were inter-learner consistency, representative plane hit score, and self-efficacy. Justification quality in discordant cases was analyzed exploratorily. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Accuracy showed a significant group-by-time interaction [ Conclusions: A structured micro-course using multi-view AI output variability as a teaching resource improved immediate TI-RADS interpretation accuracy, but the between-group advantage was not sustained at 4 weeks, despite persistently higher inter-learner consistency. These findings support the short-term educational value of the structured micro-course rather than an independent effect of AI output variability and warrant evaluation of repeated or booster instruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.