ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Student intrinsic motivational states underlie cognitive performance regardless of academic stage.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation has been identified as an important factor affecting working memory performance. Notably, different groups such as older individuals are known to successfully compensate for a deficiency in processing speed through increased intrinsic motivation to perform well. However, the extent to which these motivational effects generalize to the student sample commonly employed in the study of working memory remains unclear. We tested the relationship of motivation to performance on a 2-back working memory task, while manipulating baseline motivation levels through recruitment of student groups with prospectively diverse motivational drivers (credited first years vs. paid final years) and captured their perceived intrinsic motivation. Motivation was also assessed behaviourally through participants' free choice to complete additional unrewarded task blocks. Participants reporting higher motivation showed faster and more efficient responses, but were not motivated to spend more time voluntarily engaging with the task. Furthermore, we found that neither the difference in academic year (first year vs. final year) nor an overall sense of meaning (operationalised as eudaimonic wellbeing) was associated with student performance. Overall, the findings help to outline the degree of influence of intrinsic motivation on working memory performance. More specifically, we highlight a gap between clear performance supported through self-reported intrinsic motivation and more objective markers of motivation. Given the emerging societal and educational shifts and pressures within the United Kingdom, the findings provide implications for higher educational contexts in developing strategies to understand students' IM during university and ultimately enhance their performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.