ArticleOpen research Europe2025
Toward a unified approach: Considerations for bioinformatic and sequencing activities & data in wastewater surveillance of biologic public health threats.
Article in Open research Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic technologies such as PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have greatly advanced public health surveillance, especially during COVID-19, by enabling detailed tracking of pathogen spread, origins, and variants. While PCR is vital for targeted detection, falling NGS costs have made large-scale, high-throughput sequencing more feasible, supporting broader pathogen monitoring-including the detection of vaccine escape variants and new strains. Applying NGS to wastewater offers valuable population-level insights but faces challenges such as variable sample complexity, the need for skilled staff, suitable platforms, and robust IT infrastructure. Although there are currently a lot of efforts towards defining guidelines for sampling, analysis, and integrating wastewater data into public health policy, such as the recently published International Cookbook for Wastewater Practitioners, they often lack universal applicability, emphasizing the analytical approaches in favour of the NGS-based approaches. However, standardising protocols for sampling, sequencing, and analysis is crucial to ensure reliable, comparable data across surveillance systems worldwide. Pilot studies and continuous refinement are recommended to overcome implementation hurdles and fully realise the benefits of NGS in wastewater surveillance. This work attempts to outline these challenges and opportunities across the entire wastewater surveillance workflow, from data generation to reporting, and provide some concrete suggestions and considerations across the spectrum of activities. We further highlight that the infrastructure, funding and government-policy context in which surveillance operates acts as an enabling condition for these activities, and that technical standardisation alone is unlikely to deliver durable, comparable surveillance in its absence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.