Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718540›Full record

SynthesisF1000Research2026

Bibliometric analysis of gamification in teacher education during the generative AI era: historical trends, present status, and future trajectories.

Miguel Alberto Rincón Pinzón, Ana Dolores Vargas Sánchez, Leonardo David Glasserman Morales

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel Alberto Rincón PinzónUniversidad de La Sabana, Chia, Cundinamarca, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6827-5209
Ana Dolores Vargas SánchezUniversidad de La Sabana, Chia, Cundinamarca, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-0901
Leonardo David Glasserman MoralesTecnológico de Monterrey - Campus Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7960-9537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamification has become a relevant pedagogical approach in teacher education, yet its evolution and relationship with generative artificial intelligence remain fragmented. This study maps the development, intellectual structure, and emerging trajectories of research on gamification in pre-service and in-service teacher education between 2016 and 2025. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on an integrated Scopus and Web of Science dataset. After merging records, removing duplicates, and applying predefined eligibility criteria, 1,223 documents were retained. Performance analysis, co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and thematic evolution mapping were conducted in Biblioshiny/Bibliometrix, with study identification and selection documented through the PRISMA framework. Scientific output increased markedly over the study period, especially from 2020 onward, and was led mainly by institutions and countries with strong educational innovation capacity. The co-citation network revealed three intellectual foundations: motivational theories of gamification, technology adoption and educational innovation models, and empirical work on game-based learning and serious games. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified seven thematic clusters organized around gamification, education, artificial intelligence, teacher training, and digital learning. By 2025, the field shows a clear thematic shift toward generative artificial intelligence, adaptive systems, and automated personalization. Research on gamification in teacher education has moved from a focus on motivational design and digital engagement toward more intelligent, data-driven, and adaptive ecosystems. The findings highlight a rapidly expanding field and provide an evidence-based agenda for teacher education, institutional policy, and future studies on the pedagogical and ethical integration of GenAI.

Indexed as

BibliometricsTeacher TrainingGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansbibliometric analysiseducationgamificationGenAIinnovation.teachertechnology

Identifiers

PMID42718540
PMCPMC13550912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.