SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Digital capability as a multilevel construct: a systematic literature review of its dimensions, antecedents, and consequences.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Digital capability (DC) has emerged as a critical construct for understanding how individuals and organizations respond to digital transformation. Despite its growing importance, the literature remains fragmented, with inconsistent definitions, overlapping terminology, and varying levels of analysis across disciplines. This study addresses these issues by synthesizing prior research and positioning DC as a multilevel construct that integrates individual competencies and organizational capabilities. Methods: This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, following the guidelines. Articles were retrieved from the Scopus database, covering the period from 2007 to 2022. From an initial pool of 561 studies, 53 peer-reviewed journal articles in the fields of business and management were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A directed conceptual coding approach was used to identify and classify the antecedents and consequences of DC. Results: The findings indicate that DC remains conceptually underdeveloped and is predominantly examined at the individual level, particularly in relation to digital skills. At the organizational level, the literature emphasizes dimensions such as digital leadership, digital culture, and digital technology capability. The review identifies key antecedents operating across individual, organizational, and environmental levels, while the consequences of DC are associated with a range of operational and organizational outcomes, including innovation, performance, and resilience. However, empirical evidence on multilevel interactions remains limited, and methodological approaches are largely dominated by quantitative designs. Discussion: This study contributes to the literature by proposing an integrative, multilevel framework of DC that links its core dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. The findings highlight that DC should be understood as a configurational and context-dependent capability rather than a singular construct. The review also underscores the need for greater conceptual clarity, multilevel empirical research, and broader contextual exploration, particularly in SMEs and developing economies. These insights provide a foundation for future theoretical development and empirical investigation in the field of digital capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.