ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Spiritual bypassing among Indian women: toward a culturally situated assessment framework.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiritual bypassing - using spirituality to avoid unresolved psychological difficulty - has been studied almost entirely in Western samples. This conceptual paper asks whether the construct travels to Indian contexts and proposes a culturally situated alternative. The method is immanent critique: existing formulations are examined against their own stated aims to identify the assumptions they must make; those assumptions are tested against evidence from Indian cultural psychology, gender socialization research, and the psychology of religion. Literature is identified through targeted searches across three domains and synthesized thematically. Three assumptions are problematic in this context: that spiritual practice is freely chosen, that the practitioner has an individuated self, and that bypassing is intrapsychic. Three structural mechanisms are proposed instead: mythological archetypal conditioning as collective bypass scripts; religious language (karma, sahana, nishkama karma) as a spiritualized affect-regulation mandate; and seva as spiritually sanctioned self-erasure. These inform a three-dimensional assessment framework: Agency Gradient, Functional Directionality, and Archetypal Identification versus Individuation, each with indicators and clinical questions, and distinguished from constructs such as self-silencing, experiential avoidance, and religious coping. Although the factor structure of the Spiritual Bypass Scale (SBS-13) has replicated in an Indian sample, the gap addressed here is theoretical rather than empirical: no culturally grounded account specifies what bypassing consists of in this context. The framework is restricted to Hindu women in urban, middle-class settings shaped by the Vaishnava pativrata ideal, treats the mechanisms as patriarchal readings of religious traditions rather than as properties of those traditions, and states its claims as testable propositions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.