Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718498›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Costs of Surveillance Care After Definitive Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Analysis.

Allison Verbyla, Sharvil C Desai, Gary V Walker, Matthew C Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allison VerbylaBiostatistics and Data Sciences, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, USA.
Sharvil C DesaiBiostatistics and Data Sciences, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, USA.
Gary V WalkerRadiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, USA.
Matthew C WardRadiation Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFollowing curative treatment of squamous carcinoma of the head and neck, surveillance care is indicated to detect recurrence. Historically, physical exams are the backbone of surveillance, but serial imaging and flexible endoscopy are also utilized. Recently, assays have become commercially available, which could aid in early detection of recurrence. To understand the potential economic impact of these assays, a baseline of surveillance costs must be established. We performed a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare analysis to quantify the costs of classic surveillance procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe obtained data from the 2010-2017 SEER program linked to traditional Medicare Part A & B claims and enrollment information dating 2010-2019. Patients with non-metastatic cancers of the head and neck, including oral cavity, paranasal sinus, pharynx, and larynx, were identified. Definitive treatment with either surgery or radiation therapy (with or without systemic therapy) was required for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had any lapse in insurance coverage (i.e., Parts A & B) or were enrolled in Medicare Advantage. The surveillance period was defined from 90 days past treatment through the date of death, hospice enrollment, or additional cancer treatments. Procedures related to routine surveillance were identified, including flexible endoscopy and imaging. The cumulative Medicare spend was quantified, adjusting for inflation to 2021 U.S. dollars.

resultsIn total, 13,339 patients were identified; all were age ≥ 65. The most common site was the oropharynx (OPC), followed by larynx cancers. Of the OPC patients, 33% were human papillomavirus positive (HPV+), and for 55%, the HPV status was unknown. The median clinical follow-up was 43.0 months, and the median surveillance period was 16.6 months. The median costs were $1,246 (IQR $420-$2,381), with the top 5% incurring a cost of $7,657 (IQR $6,656-9,062). Surveillance was more expensive among younger, HPV+ OPC patients and for those who followed longer. Flexible laryngoscopy was the most frequent charge.

conclusionsIn an older population, payer costs follow a wide and skewed distribution but are highest among younger HPV+ OPC patients. These findings facilitate cost-effectiveness assessment of novel assays. Opportunity exists to reduce imaging and endoscopy spend by substituting more accurate biomarkers.

Indexed as

cancer surveillancecancer survivorshipcost of carehead and neck squamous cell canceroropharynx cancer

Identifiers

PMID42718498
PMCPMC13553186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.