ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model integrating baseline multimodal CT perfusion and clinical data for predicting 9-month functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Accurate early prediction of long-term functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains challenging. We aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model integrating baseline multimodal CT perfusion and clinical data to predict 9-month poor functional outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6] in AIS patients undergoing endovascular or surgical intervention. Methods: This retrospective study included 371 AIS patients who underwent endovascular or surgical intervention. We integrated clinical variables, laboratory markers, CT perfusion parameters (Tmax, cerebral blood flow, and cerebral blood volume), and quantitative CT density measurements [Hounsfield units on the affected and healthy sides, normalized water uptake (NWU), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECT score)]. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression followed by SHAP-based refinement. Four algorithms-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and XGBoost-were compared. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, Brier score, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHAP analysis was used to enhance model interpretability. Results: Eleven predictors were selected by LASSO; after SHAP-based refinement, ten remained in the final model. The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.956 (95% CI 0.917-0.995), sensitivity of 0.932, specificity of 0.897, F1-score of 0.938, and Brier score of 0.0713 (95% CI 0.0438-0.1135). SHAP analysis identified door-to-intervention interval (DTI) (mean SHAP = 0.95) as the most influential predictor, followed by HU_affected (0.88), CBV < 42% (0.82), NLR (0.78), blood glucose (0.74), age (0.70), gender (0.68), ASPECT score (0.66), HU_healthy (0.50), and NWU (0.48). Calibration curves demonstrated excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, and DCA confirmed superior net benefit of the XGBoost model across clinically relevant thresholds (0.01-0.60). Conclusion: We developed an interpretable XGBoost-based model integrating baseline multimodal CT perfusion and clinical data that accurately predicts 9-month functional outcomes in AIS patients undergoing endovascular or surgical intervention. DTI, HU_affected, and CBV < 42% emerged as the dominant predictors, highlighting the prognostic importance of time-to-reperfusion and baseline tissue injury. After external validation, this model may serve as a practical tool for early risk stratification and individualized rehabilitation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.