ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Externally validated explainable 3D CNN ensemble model for non-invasive prediction of IDH and MGMT status in gliomas.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To develop and externally validate an explainable 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) ensemble for non-invasive prediction of IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation status in gliomas using routine MRI. Methods: Multi-institutional MRI data were curated from the UCSF-PDGM and UPENN-GBM cohorts for training and testing, with independent external validation on the MU-Glioma-Post dataset. Separate 3D CNNs were trained for IDH and MGMT classification, and the models were combined into an ensemble metaclassifier. Model interpretability was assessed using Integrated Gradients saliency maps for voxel-level attributions and Shapley values for modality-level contributions. Results: The ensemble model achieved an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.84-1.00) in testing and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.82) in external validation for IDH mutation classification. The ensemble yielded AUCs of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.64-0.94), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.47-0.88), and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.52-0.63) for MGMT promoter methylation in validation, testing, and external validation, respectively. Integrated Gradients (IG) maps highlighted biologically plausible regions, with IDH predictions focusing on peritumoral FLAIR hyperintensity and MGMT predictions emphasizing the enhancing tumor core on T1CE. Shapley analysis showed FLAIR contributed 64% and T1CE 36% to IDH classification, while MGMT classification relied more heavily on T1CE (60.6%), with complementary input from FLAIR (30.8%). Discussion: We present an explainable 3D ensemble deep learning framework capable of predicting IDH mutation status from routine MRI with moderate external generalizability. While the same framework achieved strong internal performance for MGMT methylation status, this did not generalize on external validation, underscoring that MGMT prediction from imaging alone remains an unresolved challenge requiring further methodological development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.