Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42718423›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Design and rationale for MICROFIT (Microvascular Coronary Rehabilitation For Improving Treatment)-a feasibility randomized trial of intensive lifestyle rehabilitation for symptomatic coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Joanna Abramik, David Murphy, John Graby, Anna Lacey, Theresa Smith, Christopher Lawton, Faith Martin, Fiona Gillison, Matthias G Friedrich, Amedeo Chiribiri and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joanna Abramik *Cardiac Centre, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.
David Murphy *Cardiac Centre, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.
John GrabyCardiac Centre, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.
Anna LaceyDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Theresa SmithDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Christopher LawtonAdvanced Diagnostic Centre, St Joseph's Hospital, Newport, United Kingdom.
Faith MartinDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Fiona GillisonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Matthias G FriedrichDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Amedeo ChiribiriDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Mark MariathasBristol Heart Institute, Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Kevin CarsonCardiac Centre, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.
Jonathan Carl Luis RodriguesDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Dylan ThompsonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Ali KhavandiCardiac Centre, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), a common endotype of angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries (ANOCA), is linked to poor cardiovascular outcomes, and can significantly impact quality of life, mental health, and functional capacity. CMD management strategies focus on symptom control with antianginal therapies, with limited effect and prognostic benefit. While lifestyle changes and risk factor modification are advocated by international guidelines, evidence supporting cardiac rehabilitation for CMD is sparse. It is proposed that MICROFIT-a personalized lifestyle intervention programme, utilizing exercise training and dietary counselling, underpinned by behavioural change techniques, can improve symptoms of angina in patients with CMD. This study aims to examine the feasibility of undertaking a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the MICROFIT programme vs. usual care in patients with CMD and explore its effects on symptoms of angina. Design and methods: Forty participants (aged >18) will be recruited from two centers and randomized 1:1 to receive either MICROFIT intervention plus usual care or usual care only. The primary outcome is feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention, and adherence to the intervention. Participants' and practitioners' experience of the programme will be explored qualitatively. The secondary outcome is change in angina symptoms, to inform the design and power calculations for a future RCT. Other exploratory outcomes include changes to functional capacity (VO Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was granted by the NHS Health Research Authority Plymouth and Cornwall Research Ethics Committee (reference: 24/SW/0125, 30th October 2024). Study findings will be disseminated via presentations to relevant stakeholders, national and international conferences and open-access peer-reviewed research publications.

Indexed as

coronary microvascular dysfunctiondiethigh intensity interval traininglifestyle rehabilitationoxygenation-sensitive cardiac MRIquantitative stress perfusion cardiac MRI

Identifiers

PMID42718423
PMCPMC13553230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.