ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
From Traditional Tasks to Hyperscanning: Exploratory Evidence for Selective Modulation of Sensorimotor Neurodynamics Using Time-Resolved Generalized Additive Model Analysis.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Traditional Tasks to Hyperscanning: Exploratory Evidence for Selective Modulation of Sensorimotor Neurodynamics Using Time-Resolved Generalized Additive Model Analysis.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensorimotor rhythms in the mu (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) frequency ranges provide a canonical window into action-related neural dynamics. While these rhythms are known to reflect movement preparation, execution, and postmovement regulation, less is known about how their temporal organization varies across increasingly ecological interactional contexts. Here, we used a four-tier scalable experimental design (SED) based on the rock-paper-scissors (RPS) game to examine sensorimotor event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) across contexts ranging from individual computer-based tasks to real-time dyadic hyperscanning. Mu, beta, and a mu + beta composite ERD/ERS activity were analyzed over canonical central sensorimotor electrodes and aligned to a common motor event (button press). Time-resolved generalized additive models (GAMs) were used to estimate nonlinear trajectories. Pairwise contrasts were evaluated using max-statistic permutation testing across time. Most comparisons among computer-based conditions did not survive correction. Suprathreshold clusters found were selective rather than widespread. Across measures, statistical differences were seen in contrasts involving the hyperscanning condition: during real-time reciprocal interaction. Given that ecological embedding, participant cohort, acquisition system and interactional features were partially bundled across tiers, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory evidence for temporally structured modulation rather than causal isolation of interactional context. Nevertheless, the results are consistent with the possibility that engagement and/or reciprocity-related processes may contribute to the temporal organization of sensorimotor neurodynamics. Finally, the study illustrates how SEDs and time-resolved analyses can help bridge traditional laboratory paradigms and increasingly ecological approaches to human neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.