ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Bidirectional EEG Neurofeedback of Sensorimotor Beta Oscillations Reveals Asymmetric Modulation and Strategy-Dependent Learning.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bidirectional EEG Neurofeedback of Sensorimotor Beta Oscillations Reveals Asymmetric Modulation and Strategy-Dependent Learning.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EEG-based neurofeedback (ENF) may be utilised as an intervention for improvement of motor performance in Parkinson's movement impairment. This exploratory study aimed to determine the ability of healthy participants to bidirectionally modulate sensorimotor beta power using ENF in real time and examine learning trends. The protocol trained participants to increase and decrease the amplitude of their individual beta power over C3 using a double-blind sham-controlled and within-subjects design. Fifteen healthy participants completed the study (mean age = 38.9, SD = 14.9, age range = 20-66; nine female and six male). Thirteen participants successfully decreased beta activity, three participants successfully increased it and two participants demonstrated bidirectional control. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that successful EEG control during real ENF was significantly higher than sham ENF when participants received the sham condition first (Z = 3.80, p < 0.001). When participants received the real condition first, the difference in success was not statistically significant (Z = 1.19, p = 0.233), indicating a transfer learning effect from real to sham sessions. ENF performance varied across ENF training based on modulation direction and cognitive variables, including mental strategy, engagement and fatigue. This study showed that initial ENF performance depends critically on how performance is defined and measured. Learning trends between real and sham conditions further suggest that early ENF performance primarily reflects strategy-dependent, effort-based control rather than stable neurophysiological plasticity. These findings highlight the need for a more precise framework for ENF evaluation, one that separates transient modulation, strategic learning and durable physiological adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.