ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Emergency Department Guidelines for Orthopedic Consultation in an Academic Trauma Center: Effect on ED Throughput and Consultation Utilization.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency Department Guidelines for Orthopedic Consultation in an Academic Trauma Center: Effect on ED Throughput and Consultation Utilization.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMusculoskeletal injuries account for approximately 20% of presentations to emergency departments (ED) in the United States. While many patients can be treated exclusively by an emergency medicine (EM) clinician, others require consultation with an orthopedic surgeon. The objective of this quality improvement initiative was to develop and evaluate the effect of institutional orthopedic consultation guidelines on ED length of stay (LOS), the percentage of patients with fractures who receive an orthopedic consultation in the ED and orthopedic clinic referrals without an ED orthopedics consultation.
methodsA multidisciplinary team of EM and orthopedic clinicians developed injury-based guidelines for ED patients defining when orthopedic consultation was required, when a phone consultation was required, and when EM clinicians should provide exclusive care. The guidelines were implemented at our institution on June 15, 2022. We performed a retrospective before-after study of all ED patients with orthopedic extremity or pelvis injuries between August 2021 and June 2023 and analyzed changes in ED metrics using multivariable difference-in-differences analysis and quantile regression.
resultsA total of 4013 patient visits with fractures of an extremity or the pelvis were included. After adjusting for covariates and temporal trends, ED LOS decreased by a median of 71 min (p < 0.001) after implementation of the guidelines in difference-in-differences analyses. After implementation of the guidelines, orthopedic consultation decreased by 5.5% (95% CI: -10.2, -0.8), and outpatient referrals to orthopedics without an in-person consultation in the ED increased by 11.2% (95% CI: 7.8, 14.5).
conclusionInstitutional guidelines for ED orthopedic consultations increased the number of patients managed exclusively by the EM service, decreased total consultations placed to the orthopedic service and decreased the ED LOS for patients at a large urban Level-1 trauma center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.