ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Morphological comparative study between a fifth-generation adhesive system and a universal system in total-etch mode applied at the cervical region.
Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For both direct and indirect restorations at the cervical level, the preparation aims to ensure only enamel bonding, due to its proven performance over time. This study sought to evaluate the adhesion to the cervical tooth structure. The aim of the study was to morpho-structurally compare a two-step adhesive system with a universal system in total-etch mode, starting from the hypothesis of the presence of only enamel as the bonding substrate at the level of cavities prepared to the standard depth of 0.4 mm, located 2 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction. Each adhesive system was assigned a batch of three tooth samples with standard prepared and filled cavities. From each tooth sample, three sections were cut in bucco-lingual direction at the level of the fillings. The sections were prepared for examination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using a specific protocol for demineralization and deproteinization. The fifth generation system presented well-represented enamel micro-retentions. Hiatuses were observed at the level of the dentin hybrid layer, despite the formation of intra-tubular resin plugs. The universal system presented less evident micro-retentions on enamel. The thickness of the adhesive layer of the universal system presented higher values compared to the fifth generation system, for both hard dental tissues. Minimal preparations may present dentin exposure, depending on the location of the cervical termination. Acid etching before applying the universal system increased its performance. In the case of enamel, the fifth generation system shows a more favorable adhesion, due to micro-mechanical retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.