ArticleNursing open2026
Managing Academic Stress and Enhancing Metacognition in Nursing Students Using Reflective Journaling: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo explore nursing students' reflection journal experiences during nursing classes.
designQualitative study.
methodsParticipants were 18 nursing college students who wrote weekly reflection journals as part of a class assignment and submitted them after each session. The data collection period was from February 1 to February 15, 2021. Data were collected through focus group interviews during which researchers recorded the content's main points, topics, physical expressions and atmosphere (e.g., participants' facial expressions and gestures) based on the participants' statements. Interviews were conducted 1-2 times per group with each lasting 60-90 min. Data were analysed using a qualitative content analysis method that draws repetitive and valid inferences from the text data and participants' situations. Reliability and validity of the results were confirmed based on the criteria presented by Lincoln and Guba. This study was reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines.
resultsParticipants' perceived experiences were organised into four sub-themes: 'Challenges of academic stress and learning burden', 'Perceived development of efficient learning strategies', 'Perceived enhancement of metacognitive awareness' and 'Experienced a variety of achievements.' The overarching theme was 'Increased metacognition about nursing'.
conclusionParticipants perceived reflective journaling as a meaningful learning activity that helped them manage learning-related burdens, reflect on their learning processes, organise learning strategies and enhance their awareness of their learning and thinking processes. These experiences were perceived as supporting self-directed learning in nursing education. As an exploratory qualitative study, these findings reflect participants' subjective perceptions and should not be interpreted as demonstrating causal educational effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Utilising reflective journaling can be beneficial for nursing students in managing academic stress and enhancing metacognition about nursing. IMPACT: The findings of this study can contribute to nursing education by offering methods to help nursing students establish a professional identity and manage academic stress, thereby preventing dropout and fostering their growth as nurses. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study can contribute to public health by reducing the turnover rate of newly hired nurses and ultimately improving the quality of nursing services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.