ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Empowering communities, educating researchers: reflections on researcher training through the 'Be the Voice of Your Community' Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) event.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient and Public Involvement (PPI) is increasingly recognised as essential in research design and funding. While benefits for patients include empowerment and trust in science, PPI also offers unique learning opportunities for early-stage researchers (ESRs), however, structured experiential PPI training for ESRs remains limited. The objective of this work is to report on the impact of a structured PPI engagement event, Be the Voice in Your Community of Health Research on ESRs' confidence, skills, and understanding of PPI, while supporting patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds to share their lived experiences in cancer care and research.
methodsA one-day workshop held in 2025 at University College Dublin (UCD) combined short talks, patient panels and small-group discussions with facilitation. Each facilitation group included one senior researcher, who co-facilitated the session alongside the ESRs. The senior researcher provided oversight, supported discussion flow, and ensured methodological consistency, while the ESRs led participant engagement and interactive components. Participants comprised 5 senior researchers, 10 early-stage researchers (ESRs; PhD students and research assistants working in cancer biology, molecular oncology, bioinformatics and computational biology), and 20 community participants from minority ethnic backgrounds living in Ireland, including three individuals with lived experience of cancer. Post-event reflections and an anonymised questionnaire captured qualitative and quantitative feedback from the ESRs. Descriptive statistics summarised Likert-type items. Qualitative data were thematically analysed.
resultsNine of 10 ESRs rated the event 'excellent' (one 'good'). Self-rated confidence in speaking with patients increased (mean of 4.3 before to 6.0 after; 7-point scale). Qualitative themes indicated (i) development of communication, (ii) active listening and empathy (iii) renewed research motivation and (iv) intention to adopt more inclusive research practices. ESRs showed a desire for more frequent training opportunities of this nature. Community participants reported feeling heard and respected and emphasised the importance of cultural awareness and interpersonal respect.
conclusionsThis event demonstrated the dual value of PPI by creating a structured yet informal setting that fostered open dialogue and mutual learning, empowering patients while enriching researchers' understanding and practice. Embedding structured PPI training early in research careers may help cultivate a generation of empathetic, socially responsible scientists and advance more inclusive, patient-centred cancer research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.