Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42717352›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Adaptive AI-based mobile simulation for drug calculation competency in nurses: a mixed-methods RCT.

Mohamed Fakhry Ahmed Salem, Ahmed Khamis Sharaf, Ahmed Abdelhafeez Abdelmonseif Younis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07448259 (Adaptive AI-Based Mobile Simulation for Drug Calculation Competency in Nurses), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07448259 nacompletednot on this map

Adaptive AI-Based Mobile Simulation for Drug Calculation Competency in Nurses: A Mixed-Methods RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled56ConditionsNursing Education, Clinical Competence, Medication ErrorsArmsArtificial Intelligence-Assisted Drug Calculation Platform, Traditional Nursing Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed Fakhry Ahmed SalemMedical-Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. mohamed.fakhry@alexu.edu.eg.
Ahmed Khamis SharafCommunity Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ahmed Abdelhafeez Abdelmonseif YounisCritical Care Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication dose miscalculations remain one of the most persistent patient safety concerns in clinical practice, while traditional teaching methods often fall short in ensuring proficiency. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) based learning tools has the potential to enhance knowledge, clinical decision-making (CDM), and self-efficacy among nursing staff.

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of a researcher-developed artificial intelligence-based mobile learning application designed to simulate realistic hospital medication environments with adaptive feedback on nursing's drug calculation knowledge, decision-making, and self-efficacy, while exploring its feasibility and acceptability in routine training contexts.

designMixed-methods study with an embedded design, utilizing two-arm randomized controlled trial for quantitative evaluation and focus group discussions for qualitative exploration.

methodsThe study was conducted at a non-governmental hospital where 56 nurses, randomly assigned to intervention group (n = 28) or a control group (n = 28). The mobile learning application simulated realistic hospital medication administration scenarios incorporating adaptive corrective feedback and progressively complex drug calculation cases. Data was collected at baseline and post-intervention using a drug dose calculation knowledge assessment, a clinical decision-making scale, and a self-efficacy scale. Post-intervention focus group discussions with the intervention group were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsThe study group achieved significant improvements in knowledge, decision-making, and self-efficacy post-intervention compared to the control group with large effect sizes. Qualitatively, six themes emerged which discussed several aspects of the training such as; perceived clinical benefits, realism, increased nurses' confidence, ease of use and engagement, training efficiency and challenges and the potential for improvement.

conclusionThis is one of the first randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted using mixed-methods and focusing on training nursing staff on drug-dose calculation with artificial intelligence (AI) based simulation. Results indicated that the intervention was associated with significant improvements in the measured outcomes and was perceived positively by the participants. However, its broader implementation across different contexts requires further investigation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07448259. Retrospectively registered on February 18, 2026. Registration Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07448259 .

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical decision-makingDrug dose calculationMedication safetyNursing educationSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42717352
PMCPMC13555860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.