ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Development of an inactivated, oral immunogenic product against post-weaning colibacillosis caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in piglets.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-weaning diarrhea (PWD) caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) expressing F4 and F18 fimbriae remains a major challenge in pig production, contributing to economic losses and increased antimicrobial use. This study aimed to preliminary evaluate the immunogenic potential of an orally administered formulation comprising heat-inactivated ETEC strains expressing F4 and F18 fimbriae, combined with low-dose recombinant human interferon-alpha (IFN-α) as a mucosal adjuvant, in piglets. Piglets from two different litters were allocated into two experimental groups: a treated group (T) receiving the inactivated ETEC formulation with IFN-α for 26 days, and a control group (C) receiving only IFN-α. According to the farmer, the sows had not been vaccinated. Immune responses were evaluated in the sows colostrum and piglet serum, saliva, and feces by ELISA. In mesenteric lymph nodes anti-F4/F18 IgA and IgG antibodies were quantified by ELISPOT.
resultsThe inactivated product preserved fimbrial antigenicity and remained sterile. Colostrum from both sows displayed elevated levels of fimbriae-specific IgA and IgG despite neither sow being vaccinated against E. coli. Treated piglets showed a transient serum IgA increase against F4 whereas serum IgG levels were often comparable to the controls. Notably, elevated mucosal IgA responses were observed in saliva and feces against both F4 and F18 (P < 0.01) in T group, accompanied by enhanced IgA-secreting B-cell activity in mesenteric lymph nodes. ELISA validation confirmed high assay reproducibility (R² > 0.98; CV < 10%). ELISPOT analysis underscored the adjuvant role of F4 and IFN-α in stimulating mucosal immunity.
conclusionsOur preliminary findings may represent a promising strategy to control PWD and reduce antimicrobial use in pig production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.