ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurses' experiences and challenges in postnatal stabilisation of newborns: a phenomenological study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostnatal stabilisation of newborns is a critical phase that directly influences neonatal survival and long-term outcomes. Neonatal nurses play a central role in this process, yet limited research has explored their lived experiences, particularly regarding clinical responsibility, organisational constraints, and emotional demands. This study aimed to explore nurses' lived experiences of stabilising newborns during the immediate postnatal period and to identify the clinical, organisational, relational, and emotional dimensions shaping this practice.
methodsA descriptive phenomenological study was conducted using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 17 neonatal nurses working in delivery room and operating theatre units of a tertiary hospital. Data were collected between August and December 2025. Interviews were analysed using Colaizzi's phenomenological analysis method to identify themes reflecting nurses' lived experiences.
resultsFive interrelated themes emerged: clinical competence and standardisation; structural and hierarchical barriers; relational dynamics and safety culture; emotional labour and moral distress; and strategic defence and professional development. Nurses experienced postnatal stabilisation as a high-stakes threshold requiring rapid, coordinated, and protocol-based actions to ensure newborn survival. While clinical protocols enhanced confidence and supported decision-making, limited authority, environmental constraints, and communication gaps generated ethical tension and professional frustration. Emotional involvement, empathic identification with newborns, and fear of irreversible error contributed to psychological burden, whereas documentation practices and continuous education were perceived as protective strategies.
conclusionsPostnatal stabilisation is experienced by nurses as a multidimensional practice rather than a purely technical intervention. Clinical responsibility, organisational context, teamwork dynamics, and emotional labour collectively shape this process. The findings suggest that organisational support, effective communication, and ongoing professional development may help address challenges experienced during postnatal stabilisation and inform improvements in neonatal nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.