Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42717331›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Evaluation of the new Egyptian undergraduate medical program from students' perspectives: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Somaya Hosny, Hany Atwa, Mona S Ghaly, Ahmed M Makhlouf, Sanaa Radi, Zeinab N A Said, Hala Salah, Abdelrahim Shoulah, Asmaa Abdelnasser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Somaya HosnyFaculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Hany AtwaFaculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Mona S GhalyFaculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. mona_ghali@med.suez.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3953-9073
Ahmed M MakhloufFaculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Sanaa RadiFaculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Zeinab N A SaidFaculty of Medicine (for Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hala SalahFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abdelrahim ShoulahFaculty of Medicine, Banha University, Banha, Egypt.
Asmaa AbdelnasserFaculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global emphasis on medical education reform highlights the need for essential competencies to meet evolving healthcare demands. In Egypt, significant reforms in 2018 introduced a competency-based, integrated undergraduate medical curriculum-a five-year program followed by a two-year internship aligned with the National Academic Reference Standards for Medicine. This study assesses graduates' perceptions and experiences with the newly implemented reformed national medical program.

methodsThis descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2023 and December 2024. Using a convenience sampling, it included 7,264 recent graduates from 27 Egyptian medical schools. Data was collected via an online survey comprising 45 Likert-scale items assessing various aspects of the program. Additionally, three open-ended questions explored graduates' most and least favorable aspects of the program and improvement suggestions. The survey underwent validity testing through exploratory factor analysis and expert review, as well as reliability testing through Cronbach's test. Data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics, such as independent samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA, with significance set at p < 0.05. Effect sizes (Cohen's d and η²) were calculated for all significant group comparisons to assess practical significance. Responses to open-ended questions were categorized and analyzed using quantitative content analysis (thematic categorization with frequency counts). Ethical approval, informed consent, and participant anonymity were ensured.

resultsThe study received responses from 7,264 graduates (40.7%). Validity and reliability tests confirmed the survey's robustness, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.98 and exploratory factor analysis identifying four factors, accounting for 64.53% of total variance. Survey responses indicated moderate overall satisfaction across program dimensions, with mean scores ranging from 2.71 to 3.41. Key strengths included integration of basic and clinical sciences, diverse learning opportunities, early clinical exposure, emphasis on critical thinking, self-directed learning, and faculty support. Male students, high achievers, and those with strong English proficiency or university housing reported slightly higher satisfaction, though effect sizes were small. Challenges such as heavy workload, difficulty adapting to the new curriculum, and frequent assessments were noted. Quantitative content analysis of open-ended responses reinforced the quantitative findings, offering additional descriptive insights into students' experiences.

conclusionThe shift to Competency-Based Medical Education in Egypt marks a significant reform to better prepare graduates for modern medical practice. Key strengths include subject integration, diverse learning opportunities, early clinical exposure, emphasis on critical thinking and self-directed learning. However, challenges like increased workload, frequent assessments, and difficulties adapting to the new curriculum were noted.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalAdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEgyptFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesCompetency-based educationProgram evaluationStudents' experiencesStudents’ perspectivesUndergraduate medical program

Identifiers

PMID42717331
PMCPMC13555892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.