Trial reportBMC medical education2026
Visualizing the future: impact of holographic visualization on teaching minimally invasive veneer preparation: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive veneer preparation in prosthodontic education requires advanced spatial understanding and psychomotor precision. Although immersive technologies are increasingly used in dental education, evidence regarding the educational effectiveness of holographic visualization in prosthodontics remains limited. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of holographic visualization on preparation quality and student-reported educational outcomes during preclinical training in minimally invasive veneer preparation.
methodsSixty undergraduate dental students were randomly assigned to receive either conventional two-dimensional photographic visualization (n = 30) or holographic three-dimensional visualization (n = 30). Following a standardized calibration session and baseline preparation, participants performed a second veneer preparation after exposure to the assigned visualization modality. Preparations were independently assessed by two blinded evaluators using a predefined scoring rubric. Within-group changes were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and between-group differences were assessed using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline performance. Student-reported outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests with false discovery rate correction.
resultsBoth groups showed significant improvements in preparation quality from baseline to post-intervention (both p < 0.001). However, no significant between-group differences were observed (adjusted mean difference: 0.60 points; 95% confidence interval: -0.48 to 1.67; p = 0.269). Overall student-reported outcomes were comparable between groups. Spatial understanding showed the largest between-group effect in favour of holographic visualization, although this difference was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Holographic visualization was highly accepted by students, and 70% supported its future integration into dental education.
conclusionsAlthough holographic visualization did not significantly improve immediate preparation quality compared with conventional two-dimensional photographs, it was highly accepted by students and showed the largest observed effect for perceived spatial understanding. These findings suggest that holographic visualization may primarily support spatial understanding and represent a valuable adjunct for teaching complex three-dimensional concepts in preclinical prosthodontic education.
trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00040713, prospectively registered on 22 June 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.