Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42717229›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2026

Adaptive zones of feliforms and evolutionary regimes within terrestrial mammalian carnivores.

Paul Z Barrett, Samantha S B Hopkins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul Z BarrettDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. paul.z.barrett@stonybrook.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5717-9193
Samantha S B HopkinsDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-7472

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-1256897National Science Foundation (NSF) EAR-2021666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terrestrial carnivores have repeatedly evolved similar ecomorphologies, yet the relationship between dental morphology and diet remains inconsistently predictive and seemingly at odds with this observation. Here we examine the presence of carnivore adaptive zones and this form/function mismatch using a total-evidence phylogeny of living and extinct feliforms, modelling the evolution of body mass and dental toolkit (relative blade length of the lower carnassial). We identify three adaptive zones within feliforms: (1) an ancestral cataract of carnivory, comprising small-bodied, ecologically flexible taxa with largely stochastic dental evolution; (2) the broad ecology cursor, associated with restricted forelimb dexterity and increased reliance on cranial prey processing; and (3) the soft-flesh specialist, defined by strong selection for slicing-dominated dentitions in hypercarnivores. Extending beyond feliforms, we propose a fourth zone, the versatile omnivore, representing a distinct adaptive zone of dietary and morphological flexibility at large size. Across these regimes, dental morphology receives strong selection only in hypercarnivores, resulting in reliable predictions of diet. In contrast, taxa with broader diets show stochastic dental evolution, leading to the frequent misclassification observed in recent studies. This framework reconciles longstanding links between morphology and ecology with their inconsistencies, providing a predictive model for terrestrial carnivore evolution.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBiological EvolutionCarnivoraCarnivoryToothAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDietFossilsPhylogeny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.