ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2026
Emergency physician-modified endograft for ruptured thoracoabdominal aneurysms: Should renal preservation always be pursued?
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fenestrated and branched endovascular devices have expanded the treatment options for complex aortic pathology, and physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) have emerged as a potential alternative for urgent repair. However, an important unresolved question is whether renal artery preservation should always be pursued during emergent repair. We report two cases of ruptured thoracoabdominal aneurysms treated with PMEGs at Hospital Geral Roberto Santos between January and February 2026. Based on computed tomography angiography, fenestrations were created using electrocautery and reinforced with a snare catheter loop, whereas directional branches were constructed using self-expanding covered stents. Both patients presented with ruptured Crawford type IV aneurysms and retroperitoneal hematomas. In the first case, a 26-year-old man underwent PMEG repair with preservation of the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric and right renal arteries, while the left renal artery was intentionally sacrificed. In the second case, a 68-year-old woman underwent repair with directional branches to the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk, without preservation of the renal arteries. Technical success was achieved in both cases; however, clinical outcomes differed substantially. Emergency repair of ruptured thoracoabdominal aneurysms using PMEGs is a feasible strategy when custom devices are unavailable. Although renal artery preservation remains an important objective, these two cases illustrate that intentional renal artery sacrifice may occasionally be unavoidable in critically unstable patients with unfavorable renal anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.